“The Efficiency of Natural Gas Futures Markets”

dc.contributor.authorPapaioannou, Panagiotisen
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-30T10:07:58Z
dc.date.available2017-03-31T00:00:11Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-30
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/15205
dc.rightsDefault License
dc.title“The Efficiency of Natural Gas Futures Markets”en
heal.abstractThe target of this study is to investigate the pricing efficiency of natural gas futures markets across different maturities, for 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and whether these tools can effectively be utilized by market participants. More specifically, the paper examines the Unbiased Expectations Hypothesis (UEH) among futures and spot prices in the natural gas market of New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). The following procedures include of the use of econometric techniques which test whether or not futures prices hold as unbiased forecasts of the expected spot prices by using single regressions and cointegration analysis. Due to the presence of positive or non-constant forward premium, EGARCH models are employed which permit for time varying premium and investigating more extensively the factors that conduct to the biasedness of futures contracts for all months to maturity. Although the existence of bias, futures prices for all months to maturity are found to accurately predict the expected spot prices compared to forecasts that are produced from ARIMA and random walk models.EN
heal.academicPublisherIHUen
heal.academicPublisherIDihuel
heal.accessfreeel
heal.advisorNamePouliasis, Panosen
heal.classificationEconometricsen
heal.committeeMemberNameDergiades, Theologosen
heal.committeeMemberNameHeracleous, Elenien
heal.committeeMemberNameMartinopoulos, Georgiosen
heal.keyword.LCSHNatural gasEN
heal.keyword.LCSHNatural gas--PricesEN
heal.keyword.LCSHGas industryEN
heal.languageenel
heal.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0el
heal.numberOfPages73EN
heal.publicationDate2017-03-30
heal.recordProviderSchool of Science and Technology, MSc in Energy Managementel
heal.referencesAlizadeh, A. & Nomikos, N. (2004). The efficiency of the forward bunker market. International Journal of Logistics, 7(3), pp.281–296. Available at: Chinn, M.D. & Coibion, O., 2014. The Predictive Content of Commodity Futures. Journal of Futures Markets, 34, pp.607–636. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. Petrov & F. Csake (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory, Budapest: Academia Kiado. Antoniou, A., & Holmes, P. (1996). Futures market efficiency, the unbiasedness hypothesis and variance bound tests: The case of the FTSE-100 futures contract. Bulletin of Economic Research, 48, 115–128. Barnhart, S.W., R. McNown, and M.S. Wallace. (1999). “Non-Informative Tests of the Unbiased Forward Exchange Rate,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 34, 265–291. Beck, S. (1994). Cointegration and market efficiency in commodities futures markets. Applied Economics, 26, 249–257. Bera, A., & Jarque, C. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, heteroscedasticity, and serial independence of regression residuals. Economic Letters, 6, 255–259. Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. F., & Nelson, D. B. (1994). ARCH models. In Engle, R. F. & McFadden, D. L. (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (pp. 2959–3038), Amsterdam: North Holland. Box, G., & Jenkins, G. (1970). Time series analysis, forecasting and control, San Francisco: Holden-Day. 70 Brenner, R.J. & Kroner, K.F., 1995. Arbitrage, Cointegration, and Testing the Unbiasedness Hypothesis in Financial Markets., 30. Campbell, J. Y., and R. J. Shiller., (1987) “Cointegration and Tests of Present Value Models.” Journal of Political Economy, 95, 1062–1088. Cheung, Y., & Lai, K. (1993). Finite-sample sizes of Johansen’s likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics, 55, 313–328. Chinn, M.D. & Coibion, O., 2014. The Predictive Content of Commodity Futures. Journal of Futures Markets, 34, pp.607–636. Chowdhury, A. (1991). Futures market efficiency: evidence from cointegration tests. The Journal of Futures Markets, 11, 577–589. Copeland, L. (1991). Cointegration tests with daily exchange rate data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 53, 185–198. Dergiades, T., G. Christofidou and R. Madlener (2012). “The Nexus between Natural Gas Spot and Futures Prices at NYMEX: What about Non-Linear Causality” Institute for Future Energy Costumer Needs and Behavior, Working Paper No. 17/2012. Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1057–1072. Engle, R. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987–1008. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276. Fama, E. F. (1991). Efficient capital markets II. Journal of Finance, 46, 1575–1617. 71 Fedderke, J. & Joao, M., 1997. Arbitrage, Cointegration and Efficiency in Financial Markets in the Presence of Financial Crisis. Garbade, K.D. and Silber, W.L. (1983). Price movement and price discovery in futures and cash markets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 289-97. Gardner, E. (1985). Exponential smoothing: The state of the art. Journal of Forecasting, 4, 1–28. Gebre-Mariam, Y. (2011). “Testing for Unit Roots, Causality, Cointegration and Efficiency: The Case of the Northwest US Natural Gas Market.” Energy 36(5): 3489- 3500. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.055. Haigh, M.S., (2000). Cointegration, Unbiased Expectations, and Forecasting in the BIFFEX Freight Futures Market., 20, pp.545–571. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231–254. Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59, 1551–1580. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). The full information maximum likelihood procedure for inference on cointegration–with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210. Keynes, J., 2006. General theory of employment, interest and money. Available at: http://cas.umkc.edu/economics/people/facultyPages/kregel/courses/econ645/Winte r2011/GeneralTheory.pdf. Lai, K., & Lai, M. (1991). A cointegration test for market efficiency. The Journal of Futures Markets, 11, 567–575. 72 McKenzie, A. M., & Holt, M. (2002). Market efficiency in agricultural futures markets. Applied Economics, 34, 1519–1532. Modjtahedi, B. & Movassagh, N., (2005). Natural-gas futures: Bias, predictive performance, and the theory of storage. Energy Economics, 27(4), pp.617–637. Moore, M.J. and Cullen, R., (1995). “Speculative Efficiency on the London Metal Exchange,” The Manchester School 63, 235–256. Norrbin, S.C. and K.L. Reffett. (1996). “Exogeneity and Forward Rate Unbiasedness,” Journal of International Money and Finance 15, 267–274. Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992). A note with the quantiles of the asymptotic distribution of the ML cointegration rank test statistics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 461–472. Pederzoli, C. (2013). Efficiency and unbiasedness of corn futures markets: new evidence across the financial crisis., 23(24), pp.1853–1863. Phillips, P., & Hansen, B. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57, 99–125. Phillips, P., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrica, 75, 335–346. Quan, J. (1992). Two step testing procedure for price discovery role of futures prices. Journal of Futures Markets 12, 139-149. Samuelson, Paul A., (1965). Proof That Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly, Industrial Management Review, 6:2 (1965 : Spring) p.41., 2. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics,6, 461–464.EN
heal.tableOfContentsABSTRACT CHAPTER 1 1 Introduction CHAPTER 2 2 Literature Review CHAPTER 3 3 METHODOLOGY 3.1 Unbiased Expectation Hypothesis 3.2 Unbiased Expectation Hypothesis and Cointegration 3.3 Time Varying Risk Premium 3.4 Forecast Error CHAPTER 4 4 Data Analysis 4.1 Price Behavior 4.2 Descriptive Statistics 4.3 Preliminary Analysis 4.3.1 Unit Root Tests 4.3.2 Cointegration Tests CHAPTER 5 5 Empirical Results 5.1 Market Efficiency of Futures Prices 5.2 Time Varying Risk Premium 5.3 Forecast Error CHAPTER 6 6 Conclusions REFERENCESEN
heal.typemasterThesisel

Αρχεία

Πρωτότυπος φάκελος/πακέτο

Τώρα δείχνει 1 - 1 από 1
Φόρτωση...
Μικρογραφία εικόνας
Ονομα:
final!!.pdf
Μέγεθος:
1.11 MB
Μορφότυπο:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Περιγραφή:

Φάκελος/Πακέτο αδειών

Τώρα δείχνει 1 - 1 από 1
Δεν υπάρχει διαθέσιμη μικρογραφία
Ονομα:
license.txt
Μέγεθος:
2.58 KB
Μορφότυπο:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Περιγραφή:

Συλλογές