Interoperability frameworks: analysis, comparison, and guidelines
Φόρτωση...
Ημερομηνία
2018-06-12
Συγγραφείς
Τίτλος Εφημερίδας
Περιοδικό ISSN
Τίτλος τόμου
Εκδότης
Δικαιώματα
Default License
Άδειες
Παραπομπή
Παραπομπή
Περίληψη
Περίληψη
This dissertation
was
written
as a part of the MSc
of
E
-
Business
&
D
igital
M
arketing
department of Science & Technology
School
at
the International Hellenic University.
Its
primary
goal is to compare the National interoperability frameworks of several countries with
the
European
‘
s
interoperability frameworks.
Interoperability frameworks
are
documents that clarify a set of elements such as Vocabularies,
Principles, Policies, Standards, Recommendations, Guidelines and
P
ractices for entities that
are required to
eff
icient
ly
work together
to
deliver specific
benefi
ts
to
the public services.
Governments are using frameworks as a boost to interoperability
for
their public services.
During the past
years
,
many countries and organizations
both
created and published their
frames
. To the best of our insight
,
there are jus
t a few studies so far that
can
identify the
differences between the National
frameworks
,
Comparison
and contrast to each other
.
Furthermore, we noticed that there are no studies so far that
can
locate
a
comprehensive list of
countries with an interoperability framework.
It is our
firm
belief,
the existence of such
research
will
be beneficial
to
build
new versions of
National
and European
frameworks, and it will
also be
beneficia
l
and valuable for the research
community. Hence, this study addresses the
following
questions:
•
How do the
N
ational interoperability frameworks
change
from country to country
?
•
In which level has the European interoperability framework improved?
To answer these questions, we
investigated
the two main European interoperability frameworks
of
2010 and 2017, and we compared the latest version
s
of European interoperability framework
EIF
2017
with the
N
ational interoperability frameworks NIFs for
specif
ic
countries.
This work aims
at
noting
novel
literature and public documents, along with comparing selected
national frameworks for implementing
a
significant
conclusion and analysis used for the
complex structure of interoperability frameworks.