A Comparative Analysis of the EU and US Artificial Intelligence (AI) Regulation Regimes

Απλή σελίδα τεκμηρίου
dc.contributor.authorAdamakis, Eleftheriosen
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-25T10:32:03Z
dc.date.available2024-04-25T10:32:03Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-25
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.ihu.edu.gr//xmlui/handle/11544/30384
dc.rightsDefault License
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence (AI) regulationen
dc.subjectAI acten
dc.subjectAI bill of rights blueprinten
dc.subjectNIST AI RMFen
dc.subjectEU-US TTCen
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of the EU and US Artificial Intelligence (AI) Regulation Regimesen
heal.abstractThe governance of innovation is a persistent and rigorous task, and the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents further challenges due to its distinctive features. The intricate nature, lack of transparency, unpredictability of outcomes, and diverse implications associated with AI technology have left policymakers around the world perplexed as they strive to keep pace with its rapid evolution. In recent years, the European Union has emerged as a leading force in the field of AI regulation, with the primary objective of safeguarding the responsible and humane development and commercialization of the systems in question. Conversely, the United States has embraced a less interventionist stance, placing greater emphasis on fostering innovation and market-driven progress. In light of the input from commentators and stakeholders, the EU approach is regarded as potentially burdensome but centered on ethical considerations, whereas the approach adopted by the US is perceived as less stringent but ultimately deficient in safety provisions. Despite the presence of discernible policy disparities, it is urgent to acknowledge that both approaches share fundamental elements that should be highlighted, given the imperative need for international collaboration in the context of regulating AI systems. The establishment of international standards for a technology that is inherently transnational enhances legal certainty and enables firms to effectively prioritize the implementation of regulations that are pertinent and appropriate for their activities. The protection of the welfare of humans is also substantially enhanced, enabling the optimal utilization of AI while mitigating concerns over adverse effects and detrimental outcomes.en
heal.academicPublisherIHUen
heal.academicPublisherIDihuen_US
heal.accessfreeen_US
heal.advisorNameRodríguez de las Heras Ballell, Teresaen
heal.committeeMemberNameRodríguez de las Heras Ballell, Teresaen
heal.dateAvailable2024-04-04
heal.languageenen_US
heal.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0en_US
heal.publicationDate2023-11-20
heal.recordProviderSchool of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies, LLM in Transnational and European Commercial Law, Banking Law, Arbitration/Mediationen_US
heal.typemasterThesisen_US

Αρχεία

Πρωτότυπος φάκελος/πακέτο

Τώρα δείχνει 1 - 1 από 1
Μικρογραφία εικόνας
Ονομα:
AIdisfinAdamakis.pdf
Μέγεθος:
741.86 KB
Μορφότυπο:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Περιγραφή:
Κατεβάστε

Φάκελος/Πακέτο αδειών

Τώρα δείχνει 1 - 1 από 1
Δεν υπάρχει διαθέσιμη μικρογραφία
Ονομα:
license.txt
Μέγεθος:
2.58 KB
Μορφότυπο:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Περιγραφή:
Κατεβάστε

Συλλογές

Theses and dissertations